Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Steve Kehlet <steve(dot)kehlet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Forums postgresql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1
Date: 2015-06-11 02:16:34
Message-ID: 20150611021634.GA231659@tornado.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 03:15:04PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> One more thing:
> Our testing infrastructure sucks. Without writing C code it's basically
> impossible to test wraparounds and such. Even if not particularly useful
> for non-devs, I really think we should have functions for creating
> burning xids/multixacts in core. Or at least in some extension.

+1. This keeps coming up, so it's worth maintaining a verified and speedy
implementation.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Venkata Balaji N 2015-06-11 04:48:44 Re: Missing WALs when doing pg_basebackup from slave...
Previous Message Daniel Begin 2015-06-10 21:20:00 Re: Planner cost adjustments

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2015-06-11 02:44:53 Re: Draft release notes for 9.4.4 et al
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2015-06-11 01:21:59 Re: minor issues in pg_rewind