Re: Draft release notes for 9.4.4 et al

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Draft release notes for 9.4.4 et al
Date: 2015-06-09 17:23:07
Message-ID: 20150609172307.GA10551@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2015-06-09 13:09:27 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I've pushed up draft release notes for 9.4.4 at
> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=21187cfc7dfd82461db9119377a76366c00d27c3
> Please review and comment ASAP, particularly if the instructions regarding
> avoiding emergency autovacuuming are not accurate.

Generally looks good. Some of the references to 9.3 in the 9.4 release
notes don't seem relevant though - I guess you intend to adjust them
when "spreading" the notes to all versions? Specifically "You must use
<productname>PostgreSQL</> 9.3.5 or later to perform this step." seems
likely to confuse users, given there's no corresponding 9.4 release.

I wonder if it'd be good to weaken "Users can avoid that by doing manual
vacuuming <emphasis>before</> upgrading to this release." a bit, further
emphasizing that that's optional.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-06-09 17:39:34 Re: Draft release notes for 9.4.4 et al
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-06-09 17:09:27 Draft release notes for 9.4.4 et al