From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-core <pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: [CORE] back-branch multixact fixes & 9.5 alpha/beta: schedule |
Date: | 2015-06-08 17:16:01 |
Message-ID: | 20150608171601.GJ133018@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 02:01:52PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > OK, are these fixed in 9.4.2 or would the same failure happen in 9.4.3?
> >
> > The fixes are not yet in any released branch, hence the rush to get
> > these out.
>
> OK, now I understand. :-O We have known failures that are not patched,
> hence the desire for a release.
Part of the problem is that they are regressions: these systems did not
have any trouble with 9.4.1/9.3.6 (other than being at risk of members
overrun, of course.)
> I am a little concerned we are getting into a case where community
> members dedicated to this issue are asking for a release, and it is
> going into the core black hole, meaning there is no visibility on what
> actions core is taking to make a decision.
At 2ndQuadrant, and I imagine EDB is in the same position, we have
enough packaging stuff going on that we can ship patched releases to
customers in case of trouble. I worry about users not having that
privilege.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-06-08 17:18:58 | Re: [idea] more aggressive join pushdown on postgres_fdw |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-06-08 17:16:00 | Re: [CORE] back-branch multixact fixes & 9.5 alpha/beta: schedule |