| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Steve Kehlet <steve(dot)kehlet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Forums postgresql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |
| Date: | 2015-05-30 00:57:51 |
| Message-ID: | 20150530005751.GE6535@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-05-29 15:49:53 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I think we need to step back and look at the brain power required to
> unravel the mess we have made regarding multi-xact and fixes. (I bet
> few people can even remember which multi-xact fixes went into which
> releases --- I can't.) Instead of working on actual features, we are
> having to do this complex diagnosis because we didn't do a thorough
> analysis at the time a pattern of multi-xact bugs started to appear.
> Many projects deal with this compound bug debt regularly, but we have
> mostly avoided this fate.
What is the consequences of that observation you're imagining?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-05-30 01:46:28 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2015-05-30 00:18:50 | Re: Planner cost adjustments |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-05-30 01:46:28 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2015-05-30 00:07:55 | Re: [CORE] postpone next week's release |