Re: Need Force flag for pg_drop_replication_slot()

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Need Force flag for pg_drop_replication_slot()
Date: 2015-05-29 17:39:57
Message-ID: 20150529173957.GA24118@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2015-05-29 10:15:56 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> pg_drop_replication_slot() can be a time-critical function when the
> master is running out of disk space because the replica is falling
> behind.

I don't buy this argument. The same is true for DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE,
DROP DATABASE etc.

I mean, I agree it'd be convenient, but I can't see it as "critical".

> While I'm just doing this during testing, it could be a critical fail in
> production. I think the simplest way to resolve this would be to add a
> boolean flag to pg_drop_replication_slot(), which would terminate the
> replication connection and delete the slot as a single operation.

There's no "single operation" for terminating a backend *and* doing
something...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Abhijit Menon-Sen 2015-05-29 17:42:06 Re: fsync-pgdata-on-recovery tries to write to more files than previously
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2015-05-29 17:37:40 pgindent vs emacs