From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Need Force flag for pg_drop_replication_slot() |
Date: | 2015-05-29 17:39:57 |
Message-ID: | 20150529173957.GA24118@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2015-05-29 10:15:56 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> pg_drop_replication_slot() can be a time-critical function when the
> master is running out of disk space because the replica is falling
> behind.
I don't buy this argument. The same is true for DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE,
DROP DATABASE etc.
I mean, I agree it'd be convenient, but I can't see it as "critical".
> While I'm just doing this during testing, it could be a critical fail in
> production. I think the simplest way to resolve this would be to add a
> boolean flag to pg_drop_replication_slot(), which would terminate the
> replication connection and delete the slot as a single operation.
There's no "single operation" for terminating a backend *and* doing
something...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Abhijit Menon-Sen | 2015-05-29 17:42:06 | Re: fsync-pgdata-on-recovery tries to write to more files than previously |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2015-05-29 17:37:40 | pgindent vs emacs |