From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Steve Kehlet <steve(dot)kehlet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Forums postgresql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |
Date: | 2015-05-28 22:21:39 |
Message-ID: | 20150528222138.GK5885@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > [ speculation ]
>
> OK, I finally managed to reproduce this, after some off-list help from
> Steve Kehlet (the reporter), Alvaro, and Thomas Munro. Here's how to
> do it:
It's a long list of steps, but if you consider them carefully, it
becomes clear that they are natural steps that a normal production
system would go through -- essentially the only one that's really
time-critical is the decision to pg_upgrade with a version before 9.3.5.
> In the process of investigating this, we found a few other things that
> seem like they may also be bugs:
>
> - As noted upthread, replaying an older checkpoint after a newer
> checkpoint has already happened may lead to similar problems. This
> may be possible when starting from an online base backup; or when
> restarting a standby that did not perform a restartpoint when
> replaying the last checkpoint before the shutdown.
I'm going through this one now, as it's closely related and caused
issues for us.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2015-05-28 22:37:57 | Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |
Previous Message | Randall Lucas | 2015-05-28 21:35:57 | Change UUID type default output representation |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2015-05-28 22:37:57 | Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-05-28 21:37:43 | Re: Free indexed_tlist memory explicitly within set_plan_refs() |