From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Graeme B(dot) Bell" <grb(at)skogoglandskap(dot)no> |
Cc: | "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: raid writethrough mode (WT), ssds and your DB. (was Performances issues with SSD volume ?) |
Date: | 2015-05-28 14:27:13 |
Message-ID: | 20150528142713.GA18209@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 01:37:48PM +0000, Graeme B. Bell wrote:
> Hi Bruce
>
> I'm *extremely* certain of what I say when I say WB+BBU=good and direct WT=bad.
It is my understanding that write-through is always safe as it writes
through to the layer below and waits for acnoledgement. Write-back
doesn't, so when you say:
> WT should be OK with e.g. Intel SSDs.
I assume you mean Write-Back is OK because the drive has a BBU, while
Write-Through is always safe.
You also say:
> >> - WT with most SSDs will likely corrupt your postgres database the
> >> first time you lose power. (on all the drives I've tested)
which contradicts what you said above, and I assume you mean write-back
here.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-05-28 15:27:31 | Re: PostgreSQL Dump based backup using pipe |
Previous Message | Graeme B. Bell | 2015-05-28 13:37:48 | Re: raid writethrough mode (WT), ssds and your DB. (was Performances issues with SSD volume ?) |