From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Leif Jensen <leif(at)crysberg(dot)dk> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Meskes <Michael(dot)Meskes(at)credativ(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: ECPG SET CONNECTION |
Date: | 2015-05-14 17:35:02 |
Message-ID: | 20150514173502.GE23739@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 02:26:08PM +0200, Leif Jensen wrote:
> Hi guys.
>
> In the ECPG manual (including latest 9.1.9) about ECPG SQL SET CONNECTION <connection name>; it is stated that "This is not thread-aware".
>
> When looking in the ecpg library code connect.c for ECPGsetconn( ... ), it looks very much like it is thread-aware if translated with the --enable-thread-safety option.
>
> What should I believe ?
Can someone comment on this report from 2013?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Cory Tucker | 2015-05-14 18:58:57 | Grouping By Similarity (using pg_trgm)? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2015-05-14 17:02:01 | Re: to_number, to_char inconsistency. |