On 2015-05-13 20:28:52 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > Similarly using inline funcs for AARR_NDIMS/HASNULL does not appear to
> > hamper performance and gets rid of the multiple evaluation risk.
>
> I'm less excited about that part though. The original ARR_FOO macros
> mostly have multiple-evaluation risks as well, and that's been totally
> academic so far.
Fair point.