From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hugo <hugo(dot)tech(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Thousands of schemas and ANALYZE goes out of memory |
Date: | 2015-05-14 00:07:19 |
Message-ID: | 20150514000719.GA15031@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 06:23:58PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 06:10:26PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> >>> Is there a reason the following patch wasn't applied?
>
> >> I don't think anybody ever did the legwork to verify it was a good idea.
> >> In particular, it'd be good to check if sending a tabstat message for each
> >> table adds noticeable overhead.
>
> > OK, I will mark it as closed then. Thanks.
>
> I don't know that it should be closed exactly --- if we don't do this,
> we should do something else about the performance issue. Maybe put it
> on TODO?
Thanks, TODO added:
Reduce memory use when analyzing many tables
(This is part of my clean up of old issues in preparation for 9.5
feature freeze.)
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2015-05-14 00:22:43 | Re: SELECT INTO and ON COMMIT |
Previous Message | Yves Dorfsman | 2015-05-14 00:05:43 | Re: SELECT INTO and ON COMMIT |