Re: Default Roles (was: Additional role attributes)

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Default Roles (was: Additional role attributes)
Date: 2015-05-13 14:20:38
Message-ID: 20150513142038.GA27039@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 10:16:39AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> > Thoughts? Comments? Suggestions?
>
> Yes: let's punt this to 9.6. The decisions you're making here are way
> too significant to be making a couple of days before feature freeze,
> and this patch has changed massively since it was first submitted.
> There isn't time now for people who want to have an opinion on this to
> form an educated one.

Yeah, pretty much any patch that needs significant redesign at this
point should be kept for 9.6.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-05-13 14:32:03 a few thoughts on the schedule
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-05-13 14:16:39 Re: Default Roles (was: Additional role attributes)