Re: pgbench -f and vacuum

* Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> > * Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> >> It's says:
> >>
> >> starting vacuum.... ERROR: blah
> >> ERROR: blah
> >> ERROR: blah
> >> done
> >>
> >> And then continues on. Sure, that's not the greatest error reporting
> >> output ever, but what do you expect from pgbench? I think it's clear
> >> enough what's going on there. The messages appear in quick
> >> succession, because it doesn't take very long to notice that the table
> >> isn't there, so it's not like you are sitting there going "wait,
> >> what?".
> >>
> >> If we're going to add something, I like your second suggestion
> >> "(ignoring this error and continuing anyway)" more than the first one.
> >> Putting "ignoring:" before the thing you plan to ignore will be
> >> confusing, I think.
> >
> > +1 to adding "(ignoring this error and continuing anyway)" and
> > committing this.
>
> You want to take care of that?

Sure.

Thanks!

Stephen