From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: "Bugs" CF? |
Date: | 2015-05-12 14:13:25 |
Message-ID: | 20150512141325.GU30322@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Magnus Hagander (magnus(at)hagander(dot)net) wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> > * Magnus Hagander (magnus(at)hagander(dot)net) wrote:
> > > We could also use the category that we have now, or even create the
> > concept
> > > of a tag (where you can assign multiple ones). And then have a view that
> > > brings together a view of everything with a specific tag/category,
> > > *regardless* of which CF it's on.
> >
> > I like the tag idea.
>
> Are there other things you would consider tags for as well? As in should we
> if we do this look at a generic tag system, or just a "tag this is a
> bugfix"?
I was thinking a generic system though I'm not sure that the tags should
be free-form.. My first thought is a "release" tag, ie: 9.4.2 or
something. Having a 'committed' + '9.4.2' view would be kind of neat.
> > The biggest issue that I see with this is, again, trying to make sure
> > people know that they *should* put bug patches into the CF and make it
> > clear *which* CF to put them into.
> >
> > I don't know that we've even got an answer for the second question
> > currently, do we? My thought is "whatever one people are looking at
> > now" but I'm guessing others feel differently.
>
> I would say it should go into whatever CF is currently "Open". Don't treat
> thems eparately from a submission POV, other than adding the tag. Only from
> a "consumption" POV, through the special view.
Yeah, but "Open" currently means June. Perhaps that's not an issue but
it still feels awkward to me.
> > > > Another thought which occured to me, just to throw it out there, was
> > the
> > > > idea of a "Next point release" kind of CF, which is perhaps renamed
> > when
> > > > to whatever the point release actually is and anything which didn't
> > make
> > > > it is bumped to a new CF entry, or something along those lines.
> > >
> > > That doesn't sound like a CF to me. Again, it might be a tag or a
> > category
> > > or something, but the main thing with the CF term is that it's the
> > > fixed-period cycle of development. We shouldn't start abusing that too
> > > much...
> >
> > A tag for this would be great..
>
> How is that different from a bugfix, though?
This would be the release tag that I'm suggesting above.
Thanks!
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2015-05-12 14:33:23 | Re: pgsql: Map basebackup tablespaces using a tablespace_map file |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2015-05-12 14:10:51 | Re: "Bugs" CF? |