Re: LOCK TABLE Permissions

All,

* Stephen Frost (sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net) wrote:
> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> > Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> > > if (lockmode == AccessShareLock)
> > > aclresult = pg_class_aclcheck(reloid, GetUserId(),
> > > ACL_SELECT);
> > > + else if (lockmode == RowExclusiveLock)
> > > + aclresult = pg_class_aclcheck(reloid, GetUserId(),
> > > + ACL_INSERT | ACL_UPDATE | ACL_DELETE | ACL_TRUNCATE);
> > > else
> > > aclresult = pg_class_aclcheck(reloid, GetUserId(),
> > > ACL_UPDATE | ACL_DELETE | ACL_TRUNCATE);
> >
> > Perhaps it would be better to refactor with a local variable for the
> > aclmask and just one instance of the pg_class_aclcheck call. Also, I'm
> > pretty sure that the documentation work needed is more extensive
> > than the actual patch ;-). Otherwise, I don't see a problem with this.
>
> Now for a blast from the past... This came up again on IRC recently and
> reminded me that I ran into the same issue a couple years back. Updated
> patch includes the refactoring suggested and includes documentation.
>
> Not going to be back-patched, as discussed with Robert.
>
> Barring objections, I'll push this later today.

Done, finally.

Thanks!

Stephen