From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: LOCK TABLE Permissions |
Date: | 2015-05-11 19:01:50 |
Message-ID: | 20150511190150.GC30322@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Michael Paquier (michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> > Now for a blast from the past... This came up again on IRC recently and
> > reminded me that I ran into the same issue a couple years back. Updated
> > patch includes the refactoring suggested and includes documentation.
> >
> > Barring objections, I'll push this later today.
>
> Small suggestion: a test case in src/test/isolation?
This is entirely a permissions-related change and src/test/isolation is
for testing concurrent behavior, not about testing permissions.
I'm not saying that we shouldn't have more tests there, but it'd not
be appropriate for this particular patch.
Thanks!
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Abhijit Menon-Sen | 2015-05-11 19:12:14 | Re: a fast bloat measurement tool (was Re: Measuring relation free space) |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-05-11 18:55:07 | Re: LOCK TABLE Permissions |