Re: feature freeze and beta schedule

On 2015-05-01 18:37:23 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> * Multivariate statistics
> This is not intended to be committed this CF.
> => I'd like to mark this as returned with (little) feedback.
>
> * Avoiding plan disasters with LIMIT
> I'm not enthused by the approach, it's disabled by default though. So
> it might not be too bad to just do it. Would probably have been a good
> idea to discuss the patch in a separate thread.
> => ?
>
> * Turning off HOT for larger SQL queries
> Seems to have degenerated into a discussion of not really related
> things. I personally would vote for committing something close to what
> Simon proposed last *directly at the beginning* of the next cycle.
> => Move?

> * Unique Joins
> This seems to require more work and came in pretty late
> => Returned with feedback.
>
> * INNER JOIN removals
> Seem far to controversial to consider comitting in 9.5.
> => Returned (or even rejected :()

> * Async execution of postgres_fdw.
> Later iterations of the patch haven't gotten much review yet. The
> original version of the patch is just from 2014-12-15.
> => Should imo be moved to the next CF

>
> * Allow "snapshot too old" error, to prevent bloat
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1361166406.1897609.1424371443904.JavaMail.yahoo%40mail.yahoo.com
> talked about a new version that afaics never materialized
> => Returned with feedback

> * Parallel Seq scan
> In my opinion the topic has progressed greatly. But at the same time
> it doesn't seem like it's in a state we should consider for 9.5.
> => Return?

> * logical column ordering (WIP)
> This pretty clearly isn't 9.5 material.
> => Return

> * Support ORDER BY in CREATE FUNCTION for Set Returning Functions
> Uhm. I think the outcome of the discussion so far wasn't really
> favorable to the idea s proposed.
> => Rejected

Marked as such.