Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0
Date: 2015-05-08 21:13:39
Message-ID: 20150508211339.GY12950@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers

On 2015-05-08 22:29:47 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2015-05-08 15:22:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I'm back to suspecting that the indcheckxmin issue is the true cause of
> > the buildfarm failure

> > though we lack an explanation why Andres failed to reproduce it ...
>
> My laptop is probably a good bit faster than jaguarundi, particularly in
> a single "threaded" workload, as that test, due to turbo
> boost. Friarbird didn't trigger it either so far. It's quite possible
> that it requires a concurrent analyze or so to run to occur in the wrong
> moment.

prairiedog, without CCA, failed as well
http://pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=prairiedog&dt=2015-05-08%2019%3A55%3A11
different test, but again directly after index creation. So I hope it's
indeed the indcheckxmin thing.

Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-05-08 21:51:27 Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0
Previous Message Andres Freund 2015-05-08 20:29:47 Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-05-08 21:39:41 Re: multixacts woes
Previous Message Robbie Harwood 2015-05-08 20:39:15 Postgres GSSAPI Encryption