From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin(at)geoff(dot)dj> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0 |
Date: | 2015-05-08 15:51:30 |
Message-ID: | 20150508155130.GN12950@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-05-08 16:36:07 +0100, Geoff Winkless wrote:
> Omitted only has one m.
>
> There's an extra space in "error . (See".
>
> Otherwise it reads fine to me, although I've only skimmed it.
Thanks, I'll push fixes for those.
> I may have misunderstood: there is only one ON CONFLICT action
> allowed?
Yes.
> I thought the previous version suggested multiple possible targets and
> actions, this suggests that while there can be multiple targets the
> action is always the same.
I don't think any version of the patch included that functionality. I
can see it being useful, but it'd make a bunch of things more
complicated, so I doubt we'll get there for 9.5.
> So I thought I could have
>
> INSERT INTO distributors (did, dname)
> ON CONFLICT (did) DO UPDATE dname=target.dname
> ON CONFLICT (dname) DO NOTHING;
>
> Did I misunderstand?
>
> Finally there's no
>
> INSERT INTO distributors (did, dname)
> SELECT did, dname FROM otherdists
> ON CONFLICT (did) DO NOTHING;
>
> example (or similar); do we think people will be smart enough to realise
> that's possible without one?
Hm. I'm tempted to say that the synopis makes that clear enough. I
personally never check such examples though, so maybe I'm the wrong
person to judge.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Geoff Winkless | 2015-05-08 16:06:06 | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0 |
Previous Message | John Scalia | 2015-05-08 15:38:31 | Re: [HACKERS] INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Geoff Winkless | 2015-05-08 16:06:06 | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0 |
Previous Message | Christian Ullrich | 2015-05-08 15:40:52 | Re: transforms vs. CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS |