| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Add a new table for Transaction Isolation? |
| Date: | 2015-04-29 20:08:15 |
| Message-ID: | 20150429200815.GL31727@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 02:15:20PM +0000, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> > I went with "Allowed, but not in PG" for those two fields, and
> > removed the extra rows I had added. You can see the output here:
> >
> > http://momjian.us/expire/transaction-iso.html
>
>
> Looks great!
>
> The only suggestion I can think to make to the table itself is to
> make the new column header singular, to match the other columns.
> I do think we should define the term used in the new column header;
> maybe something like this:
>
>
> serialization anomaly
>
> The result of successfully committing a group of transactions
> is inconsistent with all possible orderings of running those
> transactions one at a time.
OK, output updated:
http://momjian.us/expire/transaction-iso.html
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2015-04-29 20:13:05 | Re: Add a new table for Transaction Isolation? |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2015-04-29 14:15:20 | Re: Add a new table for Transaction Isolation? |