| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT syntax issues |
| Date: | 2015-04-28 14:38:38 |
| Message-ID: | 20150428143838.GD19123@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-04-28 16:36:28 +0200, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> I am also very sure that every time I'll write this statement I will have to
> look into manual for the names of TARGET and EXCLUDED because they don't
> seem intuitive to me at all (especially the EXCLUDED).
Same here. I don't understand why 'CONFLICTING' would be more ambiguous
than EXCLUDED (as Peter argued earlier). Especially given that the whole
syntax is called ON CONFLICT.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2015-04-28 14:40:10 | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT syntax issues |
| Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2015-04-28 14:36:28 | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT syntax issues |