| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: inherit support for foreign tables |
| Date: | 2015-04-26 08:36:42 |
| Message-ID: | 20150426083642.GA18789@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-04-25 20:47:04 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Since default_with_oids is really only meant as a backwards-compatibility
> hack, I don't personally have a problem with restricting it to act only on
> plain tables.
FWIW, I think we're getting pretty close to the point, or are there
even, where we can remove default_with_oids. So not adding complications
because of it sounds good to me.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2015-04-26 09:22:01 | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT syntax issues |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2015-04-26 07:19:12 | Re: PL/pgSQL, RAISE and error context |