Re: 20th anniversary of PostgreSQL ?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Julyanto Sutandang <julyanto(at)equnix(dot)co(dot)id>, Mike Toews <mwtoews(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, damien clochard <damien(at)dalibo(dot)info>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 20th anniversary of PostgreSQL ?
Date: 2015-04-08 19:28:18
Message-ID: 20150408192818.GB22803@momjian.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 09:45:05AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:38 AM, julyanto SUTANDANG <julyanto(at)equnix(dot)co(dot)id>
> wrote:
>
> I thought that were no Postgres 1.0 since Postgres is continuing Ingres,
> then Postgres95.
> Postgres started from version 6.0 to give credit of the past development 
>
>
> PostgreSQL started from version 6.0.
> Postgres95 started from version 1.0 (though we can pretend it was 5.0)
> POSTGRES had at least versions 4.x. 4.2 was the last release.

Actually, I think Postgres95 had "5.X" in its $PGDATA/PG_VERSION, which
forced us to start PostgreSQL at 6.0, in case any applications were
looking there for version information.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2015-04-08 19:31:15 Re: 20th anniversary of PostgreSQL ?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2015-04-08 16:36:49 Re: 20th anniversary of PostgreSQL ?