From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Oskari Saarenmaa <os(at)ohmu(dot)fi>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #8470: 9.3 locking/subtransaction performance regression |
Date: | 2015-04-02 00:56:16 |
Message-ID: | 20150402005616.GB29404@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 02:23:18PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I just got around to merging this patch to 9.5 sources. I'm glad I
> did it because in the course of doing so I noticed a bug in a recent
> patch, which led to commit d5e3d1e969d2f65009f718d3100d6565f47f9112
> (back-patched to 9.3).
>
> I'm now more confident in this code and will probably push this a few
> days, but only to 9.5 at least for now. It probably won't apply cleanly
> to 9.3 due to other changes in the area, such as 05315498012530d44cd89a2
> and df630b0dd5ea2de52972d456f5978a012436115e and others.
Where are we on this?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2015-04-02 02:01:45 | Re: BUG #12462: NULLIF changes the argument type |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2015-04-02 00:50:25 | Re: 9.4 and reproducible "ERROR: could not read block 0 in file..." |