Re: Cluster meeting?

From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: hemmi(dot)hitoshi(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, koichi(at)intellilink(dot)co(dot)jp, pgsql-cluster-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Cluster meeting?
Date: 2015-04-02 02:48:48
Message-ID: 20150402.114848.69516812944240758.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-cluster-hackers

>> Ok, there will be no closed cluster summit this year.
>
> Cluster Summit is an alias of the Cluster Track this year.
> NTT supports this event as before, and expects more participants.

I'm a little bit confused.

Robert said:
> because the organizers do not want to say "no" to anyone. The
> unconference format will help us to solve this problem by asking
> attendees to vote, not just on the clustering topics, but on all the
> topics. People will not need to decide between attending the cluster
> summit and skipping it; they can decide to attend sessions on the
> specific topics they want to hear about.

So In my understanding, there's no pre-reserved tracks in the
unconference for particular topic since people can vote "no" to the if
they have no interest in the cluster topics.

Or a room will be reserved for cluster topics only in Wednesday
afternoon?

Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-cluster-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hitoshi HEMMI 2015-04-02 07:28:47 Re: Cluster meeting?
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2015-04-02 01:55:31 Re: Cluster meeting?