From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: logical column ordering |
Date: | 2015-03-23 17:30:23 |
Message-ID: | 20150323173023.GE15229@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-03-23 14:19:50 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2015-03-23 13:01:48 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > > I'm a little confused as to the status of this patch. It's marked as
> > > Waiting on Author in the CommitFest application, and the last patch
> > > version was posted in December.
> >
> > I think it fairly can be marked as "returned with feedback" for now?
>
> ... which means that no useful feedback was received at all in this
> round for this patch. (There was lots of feedback, mind you, but as far
> as I can see it was all on the subject of how the patch is going to be
> summarily rejected unless user-visible controls are offered -- and you
> already know my opinion on that matter.)
To me the actual blocker seems to be the implementation. Which doesn't
look like it's going to be ready for 9.5; there seems to be loads of
work left to do. It's hard to provide non flame-bait feedback if the
patch isn't ready. I'm not sure what review you'd like to see at this
stage?
I think your approach of concentrating on the technical parts is sane,
and I'd continue going that way.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-03-23 17:34:25 | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT IGNORE (and UPDATE) 3.0 |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-03-23 17:19:50 | Re: logical column ordering |