From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: proposal: doc: simplify examples of dynamic SQL |
Date: | 2015-03-20 20:47:49 |
Message-ID: | 20150320204749.GZ3636@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 08:54:24AM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> > 1. The layout of the format version is different, with respect to newlines,
> > than the quote version; but while using newlines for the mandatory
> > concatenation is good having an excessively long format string isn't desirable
> > and so maybe we should show something like:
> >
> > EXECUTE format('SELECT count(*) FROM %I '
> > || 'WHERE inserted_by = $1 AND insert <= $2', tabname)
> > INTO c
> > USING checked_user, checked_date
>
> I think that is very confusing --- the idea is that we don't need to use
> || with format, but you are then using || to span multiple lines.
That || seems fine, since it's only used for a line continuation; having
|| scattered all over the query string to interpolate each variable is
much more unreadable.
That said, the || there is unnecessary because per standard two literals 'lit1'
'lit2'
are concatenated if they are separated by a newline. So this
EXECUTE format('SELECT count(*) FROM %I '
'WHERE inserted_by = $1 AND insert <= $2', tabname)
INTO c
USING checked_user, checked_date
should suffice.
BTW very long lines are undesirable because they are truncated in the
PDF output.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2015-03-20 20:56:09 | Re: proposal: doc: simplify examples of dynamic SQL |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2015-03-20 20:43:42 | Re: Repeatable read and serializable transactions see data committed after tx start |