| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit |
| Date: | 2015-03-17 17:04:49 |
| Message-ID: | 20150317170449.GB10492@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 01:03:03PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > I think one valid criticism is that Tom should transition his
> > commitments to this new-normal, especially for the the Grouping Set
> > patch, rather than allowing things to dangle in an unknown state.
>
> Well, as far as that goes, I had every intention of getting to the
> GROUPING SETS patch before the end of the final commitfest, and I still
> will if nobody else picks it up soon.
OK, very good to know, and state publicly. :-)
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-03-17 17:13:47 | Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-03-17 17:03:03 | Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit |