BUG #12862: Bug in intarray extension operators (using generic selectivity estimators instead of array oriented)

From: maxim(dot)boguk(at)postgresql-consulting(dot)com
To: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: BUG #12862: Bug in intarray extension operators (using generic selectivity estimators instead of array oriented)
Date: 2015-03-13 14:54:56
Message-ID: 20150313145456.2516.25890@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

The following bug has been logged on the website:

Bug reference: 12862
Logged by: Maksym Boguk
Email address: maxim(dot)boguk(at)postgresql-consulting(dot)com
PostgreSQL version: 9.2.9
Operating system: Linux
Description:

Hi,

First test case showing issue:

postgres=# create database test;
CREATE DATABASE
postgres=# \c test
You are now connected to database "test" as user "postgres".
test=# create table test as select array[100]::integer[] as f1 from
generate_series(1,10000);
SELECT 10000
test=# analyze test;
ANALYZE
test=# explain analyze select * from test where f1 && array[100];
QUERY PLAN
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seq Scan on test (cost=0.00..532.40 rows=10000 width=25) (actual
time=0.048..6.207 rows=10000 loops=1)
Filter: (f1 && '{100}'::integer[])
Total runtime: 7.154 ms
(3 rows)

test=# create extension intarray;
CREATE EXTENSION
test=# explain analyze select * from test where f1 && array[100];
QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seq Scan on test (cost=0.00..532.40 rows=10 width=25) (actual
time=0.062..5.598 rows=10000 loops=1)
Filter: (f1 && '{100}'::integer[])
Total runtime: 6.548 ms
(3 rows)

As you could see after installing the intarray extension PostgreSQL started
use a general selectivity estimator. Estimated rows=10000 before create
extension and estimated rows=10 after, 10000 - correct one.

Problem that custom (redefined) intarray && @> <@ operators are defined with
contsel/contjoinsel instead of arraycontsel/arraycontjoinsel.

However, simple change extension/intarray--1.0.sql with correct CREATE
OPERATOR doesn't fix issue:
test=# explain analyze select * from test where f1 && array[100];
ERROR: arraycontsel called for unrecognized operator 814221170

I cannot find any quick fix for this issue because OID of custom && operator
isn't fixed, so no simple change of arraycontsel/arraycontjoinsel possible.

An issue exists in any version since introducing
arraycontsel/arraycontjoinsel in 9.2 up to HEAD.

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jaime soler 2015-03-13 15:20:27 Re: BUG #12854: PG Admin 3 Restore/Import Button
Previous Message Adam GROSZER 2015-03-13 08:31:30 Re: BUG #12856: No space left on device, but there is space!