Re: PostgreSQL-related legal question

From: Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>
To: Dorian Hoxha <dorian(dot)hoxha(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL-related legal question
Date: 2015-03-11 12:55:51
Message-ID: 20150311085551.21d5e346f418c54199559268@potentialtech.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:50:02 +0100
Dorian Hoxha <dorian(dot)hoxha(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> I don't see how it could have negative impact on the postgresql project?
> It's not like your job will be to find vulnerabilities and not disclose
> them ?

I don't think I should discuss the particulars of the situation on
the list. That's why I'm just looking for a lawyer who understands
the situation and can advise me.

>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > I've been asked to sign a legal document related to a PostgreSQL-
> > related job opening. I have concerns about the document and that
> > signing it could have a negative impact on the PostgreSQL project
> > (in addition to personal concerns).
> >
> > I'm guessing I'm not the first person to go through this. I'm
> > hoping someone on this list can refer me to a lawyer who is
> > familiar with the challenges of NDAs and open source projects.
> >
> > I'm not asking for pro-bono, I'm willing to pay for services,
> > but I just figured that I might get better results getting a
> > referral than by contacting $random_legal_service.
> >
> > --
> > Bill Moran
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> > To make changes to your subscription:
> > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
> >

--
Bill Moran

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stéphane Schildknecht 2015-03-11 13:26:09 Re: Basic Question on Point In Time Recovery
Previous Message Dorian Hoxha 2015-03-11 12:50:02 Re: PostgreSQL-related legal question