Re: MD5 authentication needs help

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: MD5 authentication needs help
Date: 2015-03-07 17:52:15
Message-ID: 20150307175215.GH29780@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Bruce Momjian (bruce(at)momjian(dot)us) wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 07:00:10PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > suggested to me as one change we could make that would reduce the risk
> > of disk-based attacks while trading that off for a higher risk on the
> > side of network-based attacks while not breaking the existing network
> > protocol. To make it very clear- it is not a solution but rather a poor
> > bandaid. What we really need is a new password based protocol which is
> > based on a future-proof, well designed protocol, such as SCRAM.
>
> Again, agreed.

Great.

Have you had a chance to review the SCRAM RFC or do you have any
questions as it relates to how SCRAM works? I'd love to start a proper
discussion about how we go about implementing it.

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2015-03-07 18:03:02 Re: MD5 authentication needs help
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2015-03-07 17:49:15 Re: MD5 authentication needs help