| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Providing catalog view to pg_hba.conf file - Patch submission |
| Date: | 2015-02-27 19:55:29 |
| Message-ID: | 20150227195529.GS29780@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Pavel Stehule (pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> this topic should be divided, please. One part - functions for loading
> pg_hba and translating to some table. Can be two, can be one with one
> parameter. It will be used probably by advanced user, and I am able to
> accept it like you or Tomas proposed.
I'm not sure why you'd need a parameter for the function. The function
could back a view too. In general, I think you're agreeing with me that
it'd be a useful capability to have.
> Second part is the content of view
> pg_hba_conf. It should be only one and should to view a active content. I
> mean a content that is actively used - when other session is started. I am
> strongly against the behave, when I have to close session to refresh a
> content of this view (after reload) - and I am against to see there not
> active content.
Right, we also need a view (or function, or both) which provides what
the *active* configuration of the running postmaster is. This is
exactly what I was proposing (or what I was intending to, at least) with
pg_hba_active, so, again, I think we're in agreement here.
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2015-02-27 19:57:54 | Re: logical column ordering |
| Previous Message | Arthur Silva | 2015-02-27 19:51:30 | Re: logical column ordering |