From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Providing catalog view to pg_hba.conf file - Patch submission |
Date: | 2015-02-27 18:35:18 |
Message-ID: | 20150227183518.GR29780@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Tomas Vondra (tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
> On 27.2.2015 17:59, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > * Tomas Vondra (tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
> >>
> >> The other feature that'd be cool to have is a debugging function
> >> on top of the view, i.e. a function pg_hba_check(host, ip, db,
> >> user, pwd) showing which hba rule matched. But that's certainly
> >> nontrivial.
> >
> > I'm not sure that I see why, offhand, it'd be much more than trivial
> > ...
>
> From time to time I have to debug why are connection attempts failing,
> and with moderately-sized pg_hba.conf files (e.g. on database servers
> shared by multiple applications) that may be tricky. Identifying the
> rule that matched (and rejected) the connection would be helpful.
To clarify, I was trying to say that writing that function didn't seem
very difficult to me. I definitely think that *having* that function
would be very useful.
> But yes, that's non-trivial and out of scope of this patch.
For my 2c, I view this as somewhat up to the author. I wouldn't
complain if it was included in a new version of this patch as I don't
think it'd add all that much complexity and it'd be very nice, but I
certainly think this patch could go in without that too.
Thanks!
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2015-02-27 18:40:27 | Re: Providing catalog view to pg_hba.conf file - Patch submission |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2015-02-27 18:33:00 | Re: logical column ordering |