From: | Christoph Berg <cb(at)df7cb(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Francisco Olarte <folarte(at)peoplecall(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #12779: pg_dump -Fd doesn't care about -Z |
Date: | 2015-02-17 15:54:49 |
Message-ID: | 20150217155449.GA21057@msg.df7cb.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Re: To pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org 2015-02-17 <20150217153446(dot)2590(dot)24945(at)wrigleys(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
> 1164 1.fd
> 1164 9.fd
>
> 1488 1.fc
> 1160 9.fc
Re: Francisco Olarte 2015-02-17 <CA+bJJbza-+UOuofSVCoHdn6kMa3u4zWzgKZhyU=Qab46R4vY-w(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
> > pg_dump -Fd doesn't seem to care about -Z for Z > 0:
> >
>
> With such a small dump, are you sure du's block granularity is not masking
> the differences in -Fd ? ( Have you tried du -b, or just comparing every
> size ?) ( In -Fc it is a single file, harder to mask ).
I noticed when trying to compress an assumed-to-be-Z4 file a bit more
using -Z7. The directory was 241GB in both cases.
And if you compare with -Fc, the difference is a lot more than a few
FS blocks.
Christoph
--
cb(at)df7cb(dot)de | http://www.df7cb.de/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Francisco Olarte | 2015-02-17 16:15:43 | Re: BUG #12779: pg_dump -Fd doesn't care about -Z |
Previous Message | Francisco Olarte | 2015-02-17 15:50:34 | Re: BUG #12779: pg_dump -Fd doesn't care about -Z |