Re: Upgrading to 9.4 to get replication slots (was Re: Streaming replication and WAL archiving)

From: "David F(dot) Skoll" <dfs(at)roaringpenguin(dot)com>
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Upgrading to 9.4 to get replication slots (was Re: Streaming replication and WAL archiving)
Date: 2015-02-11 15:40:06
Message-ID: 20150211104006.01e7fee9@hydrogen.roaringpenguin.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:04:43 -0700
Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)elevated-dev(dot)com> wrote:

> I don't remember the beginning of the thread. Did you consider Slony?
> It's more configuration, but it would reduce downtime to almost 0.

We have looked at Slony in the past, but AFAIK it cannot replicate
tables that lack a primary key and we have a few of those. Also
AFAIK, slony requires an initial sync of the databases with
dump/restore. Finally our database is quite busy and very
write-heavy, so I worry about the performance impact of all the Slony
triggers.

Regards,

David.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Lelarge 2015-02-11 17:02:50 Re: Upgrading to 9.4 to get replication slots (was Re: Streaming replication and WAL archiving)
Previous Message Scott Ribe 2015-02-11 15:04:43 Re: Upgrading to 9.4 to get replication slots (was Re: Streaming replication and WAL archiving)