Re: PostgreSQL 9.3 synchronous replication

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Matheus de Oliveira <matioli(dot)matheus(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Sergey Arlashin <sergeyarl(dot)maillist(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 9.3 synchronous replication
Date: 2015-01-22 04:15:46
Message-ID: 20150122041546.GA27757@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 04:21:26PM -0200, Matheus de Oliveira wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Sergey Arlashin <sergeyarl(dot)maillist(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
> Yes, I understand this. But I was wondering whether it is possible to
> somehow force this procedure. Or wait until xlog is applied on slave and
>  only then consider the transaction committed. 
>
>
> You'd have to do it somehow in your application. AFAICT, PostgreSQL does not
> provide any way to that in current versions (might be done in future releases).

The problem with forcing the WAL to be replayed is that it might cause
many existing transactions to be canceled due to their snapshots
becoming invalid.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2015-01-22 04:18:17 Re: pg_basebackup bug: base backup is double the size of the database
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2015-01-22 03:46:17 Re: Back to my pg_upgrade stoppage problem