| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "peter(at)vanroose(dot)be" <peter(at)vanroose(dot)be> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Temporal features in PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2015-01-21 23:08:28 |
| Message-ID: | 20150121230828.GA19504@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 09:58:22AM -0700, peter(at)vanroose(dot)be wrote:
> What's the current status of this topic?
> Has someone worked on temporal tables for PostgreSQL since 2012 ?
>
> I'm giving a presentation on Fosdem later this month in Brussels, on the
> topic of temporal tables, and would like to give all possibly relevant
> information to the audience!
I have not heard of anyone working on this.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2015-01-21 23:35:56 | Re: pgaudit - an auditing extension for PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Andrew Gierth | 2015-01-21 22:50:24 | Re: B-Tree support function number 3 (strxfrm() optimization) |