Re: Any changes in Java and PGSQL 9.4?

From: Bjørn T Johansen <btj(at)havleik(dot)no>
To: Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Any changes in Java and PGSQL 9.4?
Date: 2015-01-18 19:47:04
Message-ID: 20150118204704.7a100702@pennywise2.havleik.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 20:25:48 +0100
Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:

> Bjørn T Johansen wrote on 18.01.2015 20:20:
> > Just noticed that a column field of type bigint containing a null, becomes a 0 when retrieving it from the resultset using JDBC.
> > If I run the same application against my old 9.3 database, the value retrieved is a null....
> >
> >
>
> You need to show us some code.
>
> getInt() or getLong() can never return null because primitives can't be null in Java.
>
>
>
>
>
>

Yes, you are absolutely correct.. I was fooled by the capital L in getLong but I see that it returns long..
I guess I just hadn't triggered this problem before...

BTJ

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James Sewell 2015-01-19 01:58:59 Partitioning
Previous Message Bjørn T Johansen 2015-01-18 19:26:44 Re: Any changes in Java and PGSQL 9.4?