Re: Surrogate pairs in UTF-8

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Dave Rosckes <dave(dot)rosckes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Surrogate pairs in UTF-8
Date: 2015-01-18 18:03:16
Message-ID: 20150118180315.GB25809@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 08:16:47AM -0600, Dave Rosckes wrote:
> I have written a test program using postgres that creates a string with a
> surrogate pair. I then insert that string into a varchar property in a
> table.
>
> I then execute a select statement to pull the string out. But when I
> evaluate the string the lead char of the pair is correct, but the following
> pair value is mangled. I run this exact same code using DB2 and it works
> just fine.
>
> Is this a postgres limitation, or is there a specific way surrogate pairs
> need to be handled?

Sounds odd. Can you provide actual queries showing the problem (and
server version).

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> He who writes carelessly confesses thereby at the very outset that he does
> not attach much importance to his own thoughts.
-- Arthur Schopenhauer

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2015-01-18 18:06:36 Re: Alternatives to a unique indexes with NULL
Previous Message Ian Barwick 2015-01-18 14:40:41 Re: PG user group in the Kuala Lumpur area?