From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: moving from contrib to bin |
Date: | 2015-01-18 13:16:40 |
Message-ID: | 20150118131640.GF11664@awork2.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-01-18 22:02:13 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Andrew Gierth
> > 2) in any event it is essentially deprecated in favour of standby_mode
> > and therefore moving it to src/bin seems like a wrong move on two counts?
> There were some discussions about that a couple of months ago, and the
> conclusion was to not remove it. Please see here for more information:
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/545946E9(dot)8060504(at)gmx(dot)net#545946E9(dot)8060504@gmx.net
Sure, but not removing doesn't imply moving it. The other tools don't
have a replacement and are more or less actively maintained. I don't
think that's really the case for pg_standby. We do *not* want to give
it more credence by declaring it to be part of core.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-01-18 13:21:55 | Re: moving from contrib to bin |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2015-01-18 13:13:42 | Re: moving from contrib to bin |