Re: WAL supported extension

From: Kouhei Sutou <kou(at)cozmixng(dot)org>
To: michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WAL supported extension
Date: 2015-01-18 13:26:41
Message-ID: 20150118.222641.1773347733236215067.kou@cozmixng.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi,

In <CAB7nPqTjutzT==wHNrx5=4feRM9O=5-pH1ACavrVuT4WAbj1aA(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
"Re: [GENERAL] WAL supported extension" on Sun, 18 Jan 2015 15:15:51 +0900,
Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>> (Is this mailing list right mailing list for asking this
>> question...?)
> Hackers would have been fine as well.

Thanks for your advice. I'll use hackers mailing list at the
next time.

>> Is there any plan to implement PostgreSQL API to implement
>> WAL supported extension?
> Not that I know of, the last discussion I recall on the matter being this one:
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAPpHfdsXwZmojm6Dx+TJnpYk27kT4o7Ri6X_4OSWcByu1Rm+VA@mail.gmail.com

Thanks for the information.
It's what I want.

Thanks,
--
kou

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Torsten Förtsch 2015-01-18 14:12:41 PG user group in the Kuala Lumpur area?
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2015-01-18 11:37:13 Re: sslcompression / PGSSLCOMPRESSION not behaving as documented?