From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Ray Stell <stellr(at)vt(dot)edu>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 9.4 pg_dump use on 9.0 db |
Date: | 2015-01-13 15:34:45 |
Message-ID: | 20150113153445.GQ3062@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> Ray Stell <stellr(at)vt(dot)edu> writes:
> > Is it valid to dump a 9.0 db with a 9.4 pg_dump and make use of the
> > parallel feature? TIA.
>
> Yes, but be aware that 9.4 pg_dump will be generating output meant to
> be loaded into a 9.4 server. You might have to make some adjustments
> if you mean to reload it into 9.0.
Also be aware that you won't get a synchronized snapshot and therefore
the resulting dump might not be valid..
Looking at pg_dump, for my 2c anyway, it'd be nicer if we threw an error
on parallel dump request when the major version doesn't support
synchronized snapshots, unless the user explicitly passed
--no-synchronized-snapshots, indicating that they don't care.
Thanks,
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2015-01-13 15:36:10 | Re: 9.4 pg_dump use on 9.0 db |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-01-13 15:23:59 | Re: 9.4 pg_dump use on 9.0 db |