From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Updating copyright notices to 2015 for PGDG |
Date: | 2015-01-06 21:16:56 |
Message-ID: | 20150106211656.GC17824@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 06:12:30PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 08:46:19PM +0100, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> > > > I will run the script today. I didn't do it earlier because I want to
> > > > be current on reading community email before doing it.
> > >
> > > hmm is it intentional that the commit also changed other files?
> > >
> > > looks like the commited patch added newlines to various files that had
> > > none before for example:
> >
> > Specifically, these files had no newline after the last line in the
> > file.
>
> I don't think we have any files that require not to have a trailing
> newline. Do we need an explicit check against it? Seems doubtful, but
> then if the need arises, we will break it each year and who knows if
> anybody will be vigilant enough to notice. Stefan caught it this time,
> but who would normally skim 18000 lines of supposedly mechanical diff
> looking for issues? (How did you catch this in the first place?)
I am guessing pgindent would also add a newline, but since the spec
files aren't C files, pgindent doesn't tough them.
> This makes me wonder however how wise it is to update the copyright
> notices in every single file in the repo. Why do we need this? Why not
> abolish the practice and live forever with most files having copyright
> 2015? (Only new files would have newer years in their copyright
> notices, I guess.) Does this provide us with any kind of protection,
> and if so against what, and how does it protect us? Since we have a
> very clean git history which shows us the exact provenance of every
> single line of source code, and we have excellent mail archives that
> show where each line came from for all development in the last decade,
> this single line of (C) boilerplate in each file seems completely
> pointless.
I think the copyright update is more of a consistency thing, rather than
something that has a legal requirement. It is hard to see why we would
stop doing it just to preserve missing trailing newlines we don't even
know we need.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2015-01-06 21:22:09 | Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2015-01-06 21:13:24 | VODKA? |