| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "ktm(at)rice(dot)edu" <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Compression of full-page-writes |
| Date: | 2015-01-02 17:15:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20150102171555.GE22217@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 06:11:29PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> > My negativity is not that I don't want it, but I want to understand why
> > it isn't better than I remembered. You are basically telling me it was
> > always a marginal win. :-( Boohoo!
>
> No, I didn't. I told you that *IN ONE BENCHMARK* wal writes apparently
> are not the bottleneck.
What I have not seen is any recent benchmarks that show it as a win,
while the original email did, so I was confused. I tried to explain
exactly how I viewed things --- you can not like it, but that is how I
look for upcoming features, and where we should focus our time.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Claudio Freire | 2015-01-02 17:18:12 | Re: Compression of full-page-writes |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2015-01-02 17:11:29 | Re: Compression of full-page-writes |