Re: pgsql: Don't run rowsecurity in parallel with other regression tests.

* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Don't run rowsecurity in parallel with other regression tests.
> >>
> >> The short-lived event trigger in the rowsecurity test causes irreproducible
> >> failures when the concurrent tests do something that the event trigger
> >> can't cope with. Per buildfarm.
>
> > Ah, so this explains the failures.
>
> > I wonder if it'd be better to remove the event trigger bits from that
> > test, and put them (if we really need them) in the event_trigger test.

That makes sense to me.

> I'd be fine with reverting this commit if Stephen wants to refactor the
> rowsecurity/event_trigger tests that way. Dunno if it makes sense to
> do that though.

I'll move the event trigger in the rowsecurity tests over to the
event_trigger test and then move the rowsecurity tests back into the
parallel group.

Please let me know if there's any concerns with this approach.

Thanks!

Stephen