Re: Vaccum Stalling

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Brad Nicholson <bnichols(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Vaccum Stalling
Date: 2007-07-10 15:31:44
Message-ID: 20145.1184081504@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Brad Nicholson <bnichols(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info> writes:
> On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 11:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Oh, I forgot to mention --- you did check that vacuum_mem is set to
>> a pretty high value, no? Else you might be doing a lot more
>> btbulkdelete scans than you need to.

> What would you define as high for 7.4? I bumped it up to ~ 245mbs

That sounds like plenty --- you only need 6 bytes per dead tuple,
so that should be enough to handle all your 15-20M dead tuples in
one scan.

How big is this index again?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nik 2007-07-10 15:34:25 Limit connections per username
Previous Message Brad Nicholson 2007-07-10 15:22:46 Re: Vaccum Stalling