Re: opportunistic tuple freezing

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: opportunistic tuple freezing
Date: 2009-09-17 16:24:13
Message-ID: 20142.1253204653@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Does the community think that experimental performance testing is a
> must-have in order for this patch to be acceptable?

Dunno about others, but I think so. It's complicating both the
implementation and the users-eye view of VACUUM, and I want more than
a hypothesis that we're going to get something useful out of that.

If we can't test it in a reasonable time frame for this commitfest,
then we should move it to the queue for the next one.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-09-17 16:30:20 Re: Feedback on getting rid of VACUUM FULL
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2009-09-17 16:23:05 Re: Feedback on getting rid of VACUUM FULL