Re: CATUPDATE confusion?

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CATUPDATE confusion?
Date: 2014-12-27 23:18:29
Message-ID: 20141227231829.GX3062@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> Plan C (remove CATUPDATE altogether) also has some merit. But adding a
> superuser override there would be entirely pointless.

This is be my recommendation. I do not see the point of carrying the
option around just to confuse new users of pg_authid and reviewers of
the code.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-12-27 23:26:02 Re: CATUPDATE confusion?
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-12-27 20:57:13 Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}