From: | Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: What exactly is our CRC algorithm? |
Date: | 2014-12-26 18:22:41 |
Message-ID: | 20141226182241.GA31313@toroid.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 2014-12-26 13:11:43 -0500, bruce(at)momjian(dot)us wrote:
>
> Is this something that could potentially change the data stored on
> disk? Does pg_upgrade need to check for changes in this area? Is the
> detection exposed by pg_controldata? Could this affect running the
> data directory on a different CPU?
No to all.
Subsequent to Heikki's change (already in master) to use the CRC-32C
algorithm (instead of the earlier mistakenly-reflected-but-not-quite
one), both the slice-by-8 software implementation posted earlier and
the SSE4.2 CRC32* instructions will compute exactly the same value.
(Yes, I have verified this in both cases.)
-- Abhijit
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2014-12-26 18:38:01 | Re: BUG #12330: ACID is broken for unique constraints |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2014-12-26 18:11:43 | Re: What exactly is our CRC algorithm? |