From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alex Shulgin <ash(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: REVIEW: Track TRUNCATE via pgstat |
Date: | 2014-12-17 14:55:22 |
Message-ID: | 20141217145522.GD1768@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alex Shulgin wrote:
> OK, I think I have now all bases covered, though the updated patch is
> not that "pretty".
>
> The problem is that we don't know in advance if the (sub)transaction is
> going to succeed or abort, and in case of aborted truncate we need to
> use the stats gathered prior to truncate. Thus the need to track
> insert/update/deletes that happened before first truncate separately.
Ugh, this is messy indeed. I grant that TRUNCATE is a tricky case to
handle correctly, so some complexity is expected. Can you please
explain in detail how this works?
> To the point of making a dedicated pgstat testing tool: let's have
> another TODO item?
Sure.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-12-17 15:23:04 | Re: [alvherre@2ndquadrant.com: Re: no test programs in contrib] |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2014-12-17 14:41:39 | Re: Reducing lock strength of adding foreign keys |