From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: anyone using oid2name? |
Date: | 2014-12-12 18:10:18 |
Message-ID: | 20141212181018.GB14584@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:18:01AM -0800, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 6:18 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>
> pgsql-hackers are discussing some housekeeping in contrib.
>
> Is anyone using the oid2name tool?
>
> Otherwise, we might deprecate and eventually remove it.
>
>
> I use it occasionally (but really dislike it) during testing and debugging, to
> help decipher what is going on. It is a chain of information flow from strace
> to lsof to oid2name.
>
> I could probably use pg_class instead if I could ever remember what the
> difference was between oid and relfilenode.
The fact oid2name is called that, but references relfilenode, doesn't
help my memory either. ;-)
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G Johnston | 2014-12-12 18:40:27 | Re: Removing duplicate records from a bulk upload (rationale behind selecting a method) |
Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2014-12-12 17:18:01 | Re: anyone using oid2name? |